What if the Only Way to Combat AI Is Finding Your Unique Photographic Style?

What if the Only Way to Combat AI Is Finding Your Unique Photographic Style?

Let’s face it—AI is here to stay. Whether we like it or not, it’s not going anywhere. When it first emerged a few years back, I have to admit that I didn’t pay much attention to it. It felt like just another tech buzzword because of how immature it seemed. But fast forward to now: it’s evolving faster than most of us can keep up with, and it’s beginning to change the creative industry in a very real way.

As a commercial photographer specializing in hospitality and industrial work, I have started to feel the squeeze as our pie gets smaller. First, it was the rise of brands preferring influencer marketing and user-generated content (UGC). Now, it’s AI.

I used to believe that as long as I served my clients well—delivered consistently high-quality work, stayed professional, and made the best out of every project—I should be fine. Surely, good work would speak for itself and be appreciated, right? Turns out, I was wrong. While the growth of my solopreneurship has been good, the first quarter of this year has been my worst-performing period since going full time back in 2019. And sadly, from what I see, the trajectory suggests it is only going to get tougher.

Running a photography-only business these days means we are constantly juggling multiple roles—from educating clients about the value of real photography and handling our own marketing to trying to keep up with shifting trends. It’s exhausting, and at times, it feels like we’re all just trying to keep our heads above water. So, what if the only real way forward is to dig deep and discover our unique photographic voice? Specifically, how do we interpret the world through our lens? Specifically, finding your unique photographic style through interpreting the way you see the world.

Personally, I feel genuine ideas and personal interpretations matter now more than ever. Especially in a sea of content generated by machines or heavily optimized for clicks, the only thing that might set us apart is our vision—how we uniquely see the world. At least that is something AI cannot replicate for now. AI may analyze patterns and churn out endless visuals, but it lacks intuition, emotion, and lived experience.

That being said, your ability to find your style and succeed with it often depends on where you're based and the type of clients you have access to. Therefore, having a distinctive style still doesn’t guarantee your success. From where I am based, most clients don’t really care about image quality as long as the content gets them results. They want trendy looks, fast turnarounds, and cheap. In that environment, both my personal and commercial work feel like the opposite of what the market demands.

But despite the differences between my personal and commercial photography, they share a common foundation: storytelling, relatability, and intentional composition with good lighting. That’s the glue that holds my work together. For my commercial work, I focus on clean, elegant visuals that reflect a brand’s identity with clarity and sophistication. My personal work, on the other hand, leans more toward visual storytelling and creative documentation—capturing life as it unfolds, raw and unscripted.

I won’t sugarcoat it—it’s tough staying true to your vision and holding onto it in this industry. It’s tempting to take shortcuts and follow trends, especially when it feels like everyone else who is doing it is successful. But I’ve learned that it’s far more fulfilling to create work that reflects what I believe in. It’s even more satisfying when clients seek you out because they resonate with that exact perspective. They know what they want, and they know you're the right person to do it.

The tricky part, though, is getting your work in front of the right people. With so many creators these days flooding social media and pouring money into ads in the online space, visibility has become a competition of volume and noise. The loudest ones usually win. But instead of trying to be louder, I’ve found that doubling down on authenticity is a more sustainable path. In fact, it might be the only way to stand out genuinely—though it can be very slow at times.

And this is why finding your personal style is more than just an artistic exercise—it’s a survival strategy. AI might be able to replicate lighting, composition, or even editing styles, but it can't mimic the way you experience the world. Your perspective and thought process are your strongest assets.

But here’s the thing: many photographers struggle with the idea of having a “style,” as the word itself can feel abstract or intimidating, especially if you come from a technical background. Some think it has to be a conscious choice or a grand artistic statement, but that’s not always the case. Sometimes, your style is simply a reflection of what you're drawn to and how you naturally work.

How to Discover Your Personal Style

Here’s a practical approach to discovering your style—without overthinking it:

  1. Identify Your Genre or Niche: Start by asking yourself: What kind of subjects do you enjoy photographing? Architecture? Food? Street moments? Your niche often stems from what catches your attention in everyday life.

  2. Observe What Your Work Looks Like: Think about your recurring aesthetic choices. Are your photos moody, vibrant, minimal, or dramatic? These visual preferences usually point toward your developing style.

  3. Draw from Your Background: Your life experiences shape how you see things. For example, someone with a background in design might gravitate toward clean lines and symmetry. I find myself drawn to structure and storytelling—likely a result of my work across industrial and documentary genres.

  4. Don’t Force Meaning Into Every Shot: It’s easy to fall into the trap of post-justifying your images, trying to explain every photo like it’s part of a bigger artistic narrative. But real style isn’t always something you can articulate—it’s something you feel when you look at your body of work.

  5. Be Sensitive and Shoot What You Like: If you enjoy creating it and others resonate with it, that’s already a form of personal expression. Keep exploring what you are good at and go down that path.

  6. Learn, but Don’t Copy: Explore photo books, follow other photographers, study the masters—but don’t feel pressured to imitate them. Inspiration is great, but your voice should remain your own.

  7. Let Time Do the Work: Sometimes your style only becomes clear in hindsight. Shoot often, review your work, and patterns will eventually emerge.

Also, it’s worth noting that you don’t need to have a neatly defined style to be a good or successful photographer. That concept is often overemphasized in artistic circles. What matters more is creating meaningful images—whatever that looks like for you.

For those who are working as a photographer, returning clients—not likes or followers—are a much better indicator of whether your work is resonating. In fact, obsessing too much over crafting a specific style can actually become counterproductive. It creates pressure to look a certain way rather than to explore freely and truly create something that you are really good at.

And let’s not forget—success on platforms like Instagram or in photo contests doesn’t always reflect your growth as an artist. It often just shows that you’re good at playing the algorithm or conforming to what's trending.

So in a world where machines are learning to create faster and cheaper than ever, maybe the one thing they still can’t do is see the world like you. Your style—your way of interpreting the world—is what makes your work irreplaceable. What’s stopping you from leaning into that?

Zhen Siang Yang's picture

Yang Zhen Siang is a Hospitality and Industrial photographer. Specialized in crafting immersive visual narratives in transforming spaces, architecture, and industries into compelling stories that connect, inspire, and elevate brand experiences.

Log in or register to post comments
20 Comments

You are absolutely right — style matters. But not when it comes to competing with AI.

In my view, the problem lies a bit deeper.

AI is already capable of imitating style. It is pointless to draw inspiration from a single source — AI can analyze tens of millions of images faster and more efficiently, and will produce exactly what matches the desired style.

And if you are concerned about competing with AI, you need to go further — beyond the boundaries of photography as we have known it.

AI is no doubt better in imitating styles and there is no way we humans can be better than it. But by imitating also means they will always be behind what we do. And only from originality we can win over AI, in terms of producing work and client bids.

I think there’s an important contradiction here.

The problem is — most clients don’t want originality. Corporate clients, brands, agencies — they need solutions that work and help them achieve their goals.

The only real way to avoid competing with AI is to move toward art. In all other cases, it makes more sense to think about how to integrate AI into your work better than other photographers will.

Of course, this doesn’t go against having your own style — or a narrow niche. It’s more about your process, not your style.

From what I observe, there is definitely 2 distinct group of clients now. Either they are supporter of AI or those that would go all out in being organic. I guess we just have to find our niche and target it well.

And yes integrating AI into our work will be the perfect balance but I do have a problem in labelling that kind of work that I produce. I cannot market it as being 100% authentic. I am still experimenting to find the right balance

The question, in my view, is this: what exactly is a photographer's work?
If you have a stylist, a light assistant, and a retoucher, whose authorship is the final photo? The person who pressed the shutter button? And can we even call someone a photographer if they don’t touch the camera but direct a team to create the image?

It’s a question of balance — very often, the photographer’s direct work with the camera (labor time and cost) makes up only 15–20% of the final result. And that’s without any AI involved.

I know these are more philosophical questions, but I find them interesting.

My understanding of work ownership revolves around the core of the work which is the idea. And you are totally right, almost 90% of the time a big shoot will involve a team effort to create and the copyright may still be owned by the photography or the company depending on the contract where the team is hired. Its a deep spirally hole going down from here for sure

Agree!

I wrote a short post on this topic, but I’m not sure if I can share links to an external site here.

The only way to compete with AI is in how you tell the story of how your work was created. AI will be able to imitate any style you come up with faster, better, and cheaper.

What it can’t replace is the story of the journey. I’m not saying every photographer needs to become an influencer but the era of just posting work and expecting that to be “enough” is over.

Yes, story that resonates is more important than anything else in today's world. I would also want to touch about relatability. If the work we produce cannot be relate to anything tangible in the real world, it might just be way too out of touch

Hi Zhen... this conversation sounds familiar. Seems like you wrote a similar article awhile back where you expressed some anxiety over your place in photography. And as I recall, I suggested something to the effect of broadening your skill set and customer base. Of course nobody knows the answers for you better than you, but it seems like you're describing a style better suited to portraits of individuals than corporate hospitality work. I doubt corporations care as much about your style when mostly they seem to care about profits. And as was said above, AI will get better at producing any style they want.

Portrait photography will undoubtedly be impacted by AI as well, but I see a greater opportunity in that genre where you can bring your imagination and human connection skills to the relationship. Making a great portrait relies on a good relationship with your client. I especially see it in environmental portraits, as opposed to headshots or studio portraits, and I really believe that individual people are far more likely to value your style and attention to detail than a corporation. Humans appreciate authenticity on a personal level, but I suspect corporations don't care so much how the advertising campaign was created.

Imagine this scenario.... AI is being trained on your images now as a way to be used in the future by digital image creators to simulate your style. So tell me again why that corporate hotel will value your services more than a much cheaper source?

Hi Ed, your memory did serve you well! My previous article did touch base on creative plateau and pushing boundaries in creative vision. You are totally right with corporation not caring about style of work and this is exactly what I am trying to do. To fit into the niche of serving these clients that care. Its tough for sure but its something that I enjoyed doing a lot and the satisfaction level is high when I am able to produce good work.

And you are also spot on at the observation on environmental portraits. This is what I am trying to bring into a typical clinical architecture and industrial photography that the clients from where I am from appreciates.

From what I am seeing, the trend of work being produced are either way too clean or way too sloppy, where the latter is using authenticity as a mask to cover up their lack of interest in polishing their execution.

AI can train on the style of my images, but they will not be able to go on actual site and produce the work that I do, unless the technology has improved to a point where you can just upload enough images of the actual site context and even models face into AI and AI will produce whatever we want (think of composite work that commercial photographers do).

I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing with regard to environmental portraits. I'm not talking about images that a business would buy. I'm talking about individual people. People with money. People with hobbies and interests who would like an authentic photograph made of themselves. People photographed in an awesome outdoor landscape setting, rather than formal studio portrait. Portraits can be good money and it's unlikely that those people would have an AI generated photo made of themselves.

How would someone know how to tell AI to make it from a specific angle or perspective? That's our job as a photographer... use our imagination to make distinctive images. Something the client might never have thought of in a million years. And that's a fantastic opportunity with portraits. People want the real live experience of having their portrait made... not just press a button and have one pop out of the computer.

I see this genre as about the last to be replaced by AI imaging. And the thing is... you don't have to be a world-class or award-winning photographer to get this type of work. You're not competing or trying to distinguish yourself from other great photographers for a single commercial client. All you really need is to demonstrate that you have imagination and can produce a significantly better photograph than the person could have made on his own. And that's not terribly difficult. By just moving the elevation of your camera off eye-level, you've improved upon 99.99% of the photographs made by amateurs. And while some people just want delivery of the photos on a flash drive, with a little sales and marketing effort, you can sell a pretty nice print package too... something your corporate accounts are not likely to buy.

The question is not just how you've defined your own style of photography, but where it's best marketed to your advantage. Take a look at all the different types of potential customers and ask yourself who would be the most likely to respond to your style. In what genre of photography does your style have the greatest potential to stand out from the crowd?

Ahh yes I do see the difference between our understanding! Yours is more consumer friendly where the customer base is bigger. My understanding is a towards corporations, where competitions are higher and customer base might be smaller. These days possibilities are endless and its up to us to explore. Thanks for sharing Ed! Nice vibrant work you have

I used to have some good corporate printing and design work. Good work... for awhile. They would express genuine satisfaction with my services. They seemed like loyal accounts. Then the buyer would change and bring his favorite suppliers. Or some higher level manager would demand changes. Or there'd be a merger or acquisition with another company. And all of a sudden, a significant part of my business would go down the drain overnight. I gave up pursuing corporate clients a long time ago. I wanted more stability and security in my business and discovered smaller is better.

Yes this is the case with my business as well. Its practically useless to put your heart into quoting or proposing any work for corporate clients as they will always have their favourite guy which send them flowers and gifts or another cheaper guy to finish up the work during the quotation bidding process. Only a handful of my clients (10%) are the ones that appreciate my work and keeps coming back to me

Finding your unique photography style means nothing when going against AI. The whole premise behind AI is stealing a photographers work, learning the photographers style, then duplicating that style with little to no effort. By creating a unique style, your actually adding fuel to the fire. In my opinion, the best way to combat AI is learning copyright and use laws. Also by holding these AI companies responsible for their rampant and ruthless artistry theft.

You are not wrong at all, but from how I see it by AI copying what we do, that means they will always be behind us and what we need to do is just bring in what we experience, our story and our vision to the table. Copyright law will protect us, but I doubt a single creator will be able to go against a group of highly paid lawyers whose job is to play around with laws. Let alone the amount of financial damages if we choose to pursue the case unless we have sufficient evidence of wrong doings.

I tried action photography for kids from 8-16 years of age and it seemed no one was interested. I would be the only one at the hockey arena with a camera. Nobody really approached me for my services.

Hockey photography was my niche. I enjoy it and felt I "cornered the market". I would still like to keep going because no one else seem to not want to shoot hockey.

I strongly believe if you keep doing something that you believe in. Some day somehow you will connect with the right people that appreciates it! You could try to share and talk about your work more in places with high visibility.

In my opinion sports is a tough genre to be in because you will need to really be at the top of the game, owning the best gears (af speed, burst speed, lens range), shoot in tough conditions, connect the right people, be present at most games and find a way to sustain yourself financially until you get a proper pay check.

I do wish you all the best for having the courage to keep going!